It is easy to forget what a young country America really is. In particular, I would like to describe in more detail this administration's approach.īefore doing so, I would like to make few commonplace observations about the original document itself. Today I would like to discuss further the meaning of constitutional fidelity. Still, whatever the differences, most participants are agreed about the same high objective: fidelity to our fundamental law. Caricatures and straw men, as one customarily finds even in the greatest debates, have made appearances. There has been some misunderstanding, some perhaps on purpose. But occasionally there has been confusion. Representatives of the three branches of the federal government have entered the debate, journalistic commentators too.Ī great deal has already been said, much of it of merit and on point. In recent weeks there have been important new contributions to this debate from some of the most distinguished scholars and jurists in the land. It invites the participation of the best minds the bar, the academy, and the bench have to offer. This debate on the Constitution involves great and fundamental issues.
#EDWIN MEESE III FREE#
Unlike people of many other countries, we are free both to discover the defects of our laws, and our government through open discussion and to correct them through our political system. The current debate is sign of a healthy nation. It is not simply a ceremonial debate, but one that promises to have a profound impact on the future of our Republic. Now, as we approach the bicentennial of the framing of the Constitution, we are witnessing another debate concerning our fundamental law. From the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists, to Webster and Calhoun, to Lincoln and Douglas, we find many examples.
Attorney General Edwin Meese III Before the DC Chapter of the Federalist Society Lawyers DivisionĪ large part of American history has been the history of Constitutional debate.
0 kommentar(er)
